The overturning of Roe vs. Wade

One of the most rapacious efforts to outlaw abortion and overturn Roe v. Wade has taken a legal blow.

This week, a U.S. District Court judge in Austin enjoined Texas state officials from enforcing parts of a highly restrictive law, which include particular sections that require doctors who provide abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. They also struck down a provision that would have removed a doctor’s ability to make the health of the mother a factor in providing a late-term abortion.

Download audio file

U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel declared that the admittance requirement “places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her.”

The court did, however, uphold a number of controversial aspects such as the 20-month limit and a method required by the law that many doctors say is outdated and even dangerous.

A majority of women’s health providers in the state filed the original bill, with many of them calling the decision a mixed bag for them. On the other side, the state has vowed to appeal. Carmen Russell-Sluchansky speaks with Terry O’Neill, the President of the National Organization for Women.

About Carmen Munir Russell-Sluchansky 360 Articles
Carmen is a multimedia journalist based in Washington, DC whose work has appeared in a variety of outlets including National Geographic, NBC News, the BBC, Asia! Magazine, The China Post, Chicago Tribune and Orlando Sentinel.