Supreme Court decides dog sniffing outside home requires warrant

The Court declared that using a police dog to sniff outside a house constitutes a search for purposes of Fourth Amendment privacy protections.

Due Diligence’s Carmen Russell-Sluchansky talks with Leslie Shoebotham, Professor at Loyola University’s New Orleans College of Law:

 

Download

Lost in the furor over gay marriage, the Supreme Court ruled on a landmark Fourth Amendment case. Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the majority opinion, resolved the question on property rights grounds. Going on someone’s porch, he said, is trespassing, and therefore so is a police search.

About Carmen Munir Russell-Sluchansky 360 Articles
Carmen is a multimedia journalist based in Washington, DC whose work has appeared in a variety of outlets including National Geographic, NBC News, the BBC, Asia! Magazine, The China Post, Chicago Tribune and Orlando Sentinel.